Cheapest One Way flight of a Month
Cheapest One Way flight of a Day
Cheapest Round Trip flight of a Month
Cheapest Round Trip flight of a Day
I do not know what it would be like Field Marshal Abdel Fattah Sisi mode when going through the eyes of the reader of these lines? You will be in his position as defense minister and commander in chief of the armed forces? Or whether it will translate what he had promised a week ago that he would not turn his back popular demands Petrhha president of the republic? Whatever the situation is a matter of time most likely, and that he would resign from his post and become a citizen civilians shall enjoy all political rights, and then becomes the former military. However , some fear, but did not proclaim it through media tools, that it will restore Egypt to the period of military rule ever known before. Oama was a revolution in January looked forward to the establishment of the state of civil, not a country ruled by the military and not the clergy, he was considered to nominate Sisi Unjaha expected defeat Lohd hopes Lhzh major revolution. But supporters of the candidacy Marshal Sisi and they are numerous, they will rush to say that nominates former officer does not necessarily mean the militarization of the political system, they add Look at France ruled by General Charles de Gaulle , eleven years from 1958 to 1969, he did not say a France has turned into a military system during the rule of de Gaulle who was elected by the French people of the two sessions, de Gaulle refused to complete its second session. They go on to say that even the United States , General Eisenhower was elected its people president for two terms, and as well as he loved no one has claimed that the United States has become during Mdtah governing military regime, but it is noteworthy that Eisenhower specifically is the one who warned the American people from the domination of the alliance between the military and senior industrialists on economic destiny and the overall policies, coupled since then , the military industrial complex as the Dwight D. Eisenhower 's term. So why do not we have a situation similar to what is known in the country under the rule of both the Eisenhower and de Gaulle, and who did not witness the violations of human rights due to their assumption of power? And why some people raise these concerns? Is it actually can become Egypt 's experience with the rule is coming and a possible military commander of the former are similar to those defined by the top Western countries? ••• First to be noted that the reluctance, but not to any of these two leaders to think of the militarization of the country, no longer misses being popular. Each of them was a hero daring enjoys broad support from the public opinion in his country, and rightly so. Eisenhower is the one who led the US and allied armies in Europe in the war against Nazi Germany forces and his hands on Europe and the United States knew the victory against Nazism and fascism forces allied in Italy. And raise the Charles de Gaulle banner of resistance in his country against Nazi occupation forces and the head of its government two years after liberation, and retired from politics a dozen years until he returned to the Elysee Palace, French President headquarters elected, but remained in revolt generals of the French army in Algeria who imagine the saving them from a weak and unstable government does not support enough of their war against the Algerian people. However, each keen to stick to the basic rules of the democratic system in the country; including full respect for civil and political rights of citizens. Fought Eisenhower election candidate for the Republican Party one of the two major parties in the United States, fought by de Gaulle in France, supported by a new party called itself the Union name for the new republic, faced Eisenhower strong opposition from rival Adlai Stevenson, the Democratic Party candidate won 44% of the vote against 55% of Eisenhower, was Nasr de Gaulle easy because right and center forces they support him and got stronger rival, George Maran Communist party candidate on more than 13% of the votes and won the other contender Albert Catip of the Union of Democratic forces on 8% of the vote, and took de Gaulle support 78 % of voters. But it is important that all of these competitors have enjoyed equal opportunities to contest the elections, and did not discriminate any state institutions of former military leaders, and elections were held in all fairness, did not suspect any of the competitors who were beaten by the outcome of the election did not reflect the popular will. Perhaps it is interesting interesting to both of them was irresistible throughout the military's influence outside of its duties stipulated constitutionally circle. Eisenhower warned of the alliance between the military and industry, and survived de Gaulle from trying the French military leaders of plotting to assassinate him, but he isolate them, and negotiate with the Algerian Liberation Front and by the end the independence of Algeria in the year 1962. Although de Gaulle had himself select a new constitution for France landmarks, but it was motivated by a desire to France out of crisis, government instability, who knew him under the fourth Republic, which preceded it, but it is still de Gaulle Constitution, which governs political life in France until today, after forty-five years on his withdrawal from political life.
