Cheapest One Way flight of a Month
Cheapest One Way flight of a Day
Cheapest Round Trip flight of a Month
Cheapest Round Trip flight of a Day
Posted on: Sunday, December 25, 2016 - 21:45 | Last Updated: Sunday, December 25, 2016 - 21:45 The Security Council passed a resolution unanimously (14 votes to none, with one country voting is the United States) proclaims that all settlements built by Israel in the territories occupied in 1967, including those held in Jerusalem, have no legal validity and constitute a grave breach of international law a large obstacle to the two - state solution. The resolution demands that Israel immediately halt all settlement activity (according to a report Quartet problem of the United States, Russia, European Union and United Nations, the number of settlers has reached in July last year 570 thousand settlers in the occupied territories), and declares the Security Council in its resolution that it will not recognize any changes in the border according to the lines of June 4, 1967, including Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations, and calls on all states distinction between Israel and the occupied territories. For the first time the United States will allow the issuance of such a decision, which abstained from voting and did not use the right of veto (The previous time that a similar attempt was made in 2011 was nipped decision to use the veto). This has been the buzz of the Security Council with applause as soon as the resolution passed in the previous is the first of its kind did not happen in the United Nations history that the members of the Council applauded the decision they have taken .. The applause sometimes happens in the gallery on the part of the public only in rare cases. Ambassador Samantha Power delegate America and the United Nations has announced that as soon as the decision to explain to a vote of her country that Obama is the first president allows the issuance of such a decision regarding the settlements, and that despite the fact that America's policy in this regard has remained constant in opposing settlement activity throughout the decades with succession of Democratic and Republican administrations. Which called on the United States to allow the passage of the resolution is a major expansion in the construction of settlements have come to represent a danger to the policy of «two-state solution» and referred in this connection to the famous «Netanyahu told goodbye for the two countries» he made after Donald Trump's victory in the presidential election, as indicated another element which alert the Israeli Knesset to pass a law legitimizing the settlements built on land owned by Palestinians for individuals, which is illegal, even in light of Israeli law. She added that the United States has been over the past five decades urges Israel secretly and openly, to stop settlement expansion which is actually undermines Israel's security can not be any two-state solution based country to agree at the same time on the settlement expansion. US official spokesman has announced that the United States is not behind this project is the Egyptian initiative from the outset. Egypt is prepared which carried a distributed officially given its name to the Security Council has been returned Vshpth Vtbnth other countries. *** What happened is that Egypt is already prepared a draft resolution in cooperation and coordination with the Palestinian delegation which is officially submitted to the Security Council on Wednesday, December 21 and identified session on Friday, December 23 to vote, but that Egypt is back and pulled it, arose four other countries represent the four geographical groups at the United Nations It is Asian (Malaysia) and African (Senegal) and Latin America (Venezuela) and western (New Zealand) to re-submit the draft resolution was passed by a majority of 14 members, including Egypt, of the total 15, with the United States abstaining. I could have this decision issued in the name of Egypt is the only name by which it has taken the initiative which is drafted by a conducted in consultation with Member States about so ready for release. This was added to the balance of Egypt as the Arab and Muslim country that has succeeded for the first time in the passage of resolution to this the weight of the Security Council. At first, Israel did not pay Thread interest depending on the US veto secured, how many projects decisions for Palestinian Rights, which received the approval of the members of the Council had been shut off US veto, however, when it became clear to Israel that America would not use its veto, gone crazy, Netanyahu contacted Petramb to pressure Egypt to withdraw a decision that has already occurred in the hope that it gives more time to Trump when he took office in Israel and become a sure protection. And who took on the ancient Egyptian diplomacy, it was incumbent upon them to make it clear to the decision-maker of the following: The draft resolution was withdrawn, without objective justification, and after taking the blue color of the United Nations shall mean any became in the final stages after the end of the stage of consultations, the withdrawn under these circumstances is an explicit declaration of succumbing to pressure. That there is no secret of the United Nations and that the United States' decision not to use the veto popularized his command and that the withdrawal of Egypt for the project will not prevent another state offers to re-ask the Council which is what happened. So Anna will not withdraw from the project: only loss of the effort that we have made in the preparation, promotion and loss adopted this successful endeavor. The decision was the latest seismic echo in Israel. Some have even announced that the United States has abandoned Israel and its defense policy in international forums. Israeli Minister of Energy who is close to Netanyahu said that this decision is not directed against the settlements, but against Israel and the Jewish people, while Netanyahu was quick to declare the rejection of the resolution (resolution enforceable in accordance with the commitment of Member States to respect the Security Council resolutions, because it is issued under Chapter VI's dispute settlement peacefully and not under Chapter VII, which ranks the penalties for non-implementation of decisions, including the use of force), Netanyahu said that Israel rejects this decision disgraceful, which is the Western wall (Wailing wall) occupied territory, and cut off economic aid to Senegal canceled the visit Ambassador of New Zealand non-resident has ..
